The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinarsUrbanity
Industry Excellence
Urban Leader
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
UPCOMING EVENT - INDUSTRIAL AND LOGISTICS SUMMIT 16 OCTOBER, SYDNEY
INDUSTRIAL AND LOGISTICS SUMMIT - TICKETS NOW ON SALE
LEARN MOREDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
print
Print
InfrastructureLindsay SaundersTue 16 Sep 25

Tasmanian Premier Shrugs off Damning Stadium Report

The Tasmanian premier says a controversial stadium planned for Hobart will go ahead despite a damning report by the state’s planning commission.

The long-awaited assessment by the Tasmanian Planning Commission, released Wednesday, recommended that the proposed Macquarie Point AFL stadium should not proceed

The final report said that the stadium would “diminish the economic welfare” of the state, the government's cost-benefit had been significantly overestimated and that it would have an “irrevocable and unacceptable” impact on Hobart's landscape.

The commission said the government would need to accumulate $1 billion in debt for construction costs. That would rise to $1.8 billion over 10 years, so taxes would need to increase $50 million per year over 30 years.

It said the construction cost was equal to $5900 for each household not reliant on Commonwealth income support in Tasmania.

The report provided a $974 million upfront construction cost, including car park, buses, lifecycle costs and state subsidy for the Tasmania Devils AFL club.

Its cost-benefit ratio was less than 0.5, the report said, meaning that for every $1 spent, less than a 50c direct benefit would be returned.

The report was highly critical of the planning elements of the stadium, pointing to its size as a major issue.

“The fundamental problem is the size, location and geographical features of the site, in its highly valued context, do not support the disproportionately large, monolithic building proposed,” the report said.

rendering of the new stadium with its domed roof
▲ A rendering of the controversial Macquarie Point Stadium.

But Premier Jeremy Rockliff said the report had “strengthened my resolve”.

Rockliff addressed media at an AFL ground in the north of the state not long after the report was released.

“What’s important now is members of parliament have their say,” he said.

“We’ll make sure the dreams and aspirations and opportunities with the stadium will come to fruition.

“We’re going to prove to the rest of the nation that opportunities like this can go ahead.

“Today is just another step. The report said this is still constructable.

“We are taking a step forward today.”

Rockliff said he remained enthusiastic about the project and the opportunities it would provide, and that the government “vehemently” disagreed with the report’s economic figures.

three images of a proposed stadium in hobart showing its visual impact on more traditional buildings.
▲ Renderings of the new stadium and its impact on views in Hobart.

The premier said the stadium project was now estimated at $1.13 billion, up $185 million from a previous estimate of $945 million, which itself was $415 million higher than the original estimate of $715 million.

He also rejected the report’s projected amount of taxpayer funding needed for the stadium and said taxes wouldn’t be raised.

The 9.3ha site proposed for the stadium is near the CBD, tucked between the Hobart Cenotaph and the Macquarie Wharf. The historic Goods Shed on the site would be relocated to the northern section of the site.

The multi-purpose stadium has a 58,500sq m footprint and an oval the same size as the Melbourne Cricket Ground. The planned transparent dome is 54m at its external peak. 

The stadium would offer a 23,000-seated capacity for games, 31,500 patron capacity for concerts and a 1500-person function room.

Melbourne’s population is about 5.3 million people. Tasmania’s population is around 580,000.

InfrastructureHobartProject
AUTHOR
Lindsay Saunders
The Urban Developer - News Editor
More articles by this author
linkedin icon
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
Korean coliving hero
Exclusive

Disconnection by Design: Why ‘Untech’ is the Next Big Amenity

Clare Burnett
5 Min
Global Shifts Redraw the Map for Australia’s Office Market
Exclusive

Office Eyes Slowdown as New Stock Supply Becomes a Trickle

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
Salta MD Sam Tarascio
Exclusive

Why Salta Won’t Break Ground on $400m Pipeline

Leon Della Bosca
7 Min
Exclusive

Precinct Proposals Bloom as Brisbane Middle-Ring Sheds its Past

Phil Bartsch
8 Min
Exclusive

Newest Land Lease Player Plots Sector Shake-Up

Taryn Paris
5 Min
View All >
Kokoda Teneriffe Banks HERO
Development

Kokoda Settles Teneriffe Banks as Melb Project Completes

Leon Della Bosca
Development

Finalists Announced for The Urban Developer’s Urban Leader Awards 2025​

David Di Marco
Shayher 309 North Quay DA hero
Development

Twin-Tower ‘Gateway’ Revealed for Brisbane Renewal Precinct

Phil Bartsch
The apartment skyscrapers, among the tallest in the River City, would anchor its largest transport-led rejuvenation proj…
LATEST
Kokoda Teneriffe Banks HERO
Development

Kokoda Settles Teneriffe Banks as Melb Project Completes

Leon Della Bosca
3 Min
Development

Finalists Announced for The Urban Developer’s Urban Leader Awards 2025​

David Di Marco
9 Min
Shayher 309 North Quay DA hero
Development

Twin-Tower ‘Gateway’ Revealed for Brisbane Renewal Precinct

Phil Bartsch
3 Min
Korean coliving hero
Exclusive

Disconnection by Design: Why ‘Untech’ is the Next Big Amenity

Clare Burnett
5 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://uat.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/hobart-stadium-report-rockcliff-rejects-tasmania